Friday, September 15, 2017

Abba Isn't Daddy

By Barbara Buzzard

“The complete novelty and uniqueness of Abba as an address to God in the prayers of Jesus shows that it expresses the heart of Jesus’ relationship to God. He spoke to God as a child to its father: confidently and securely, and yet at the same time reverently and obediently.”[1] Marianne Meye Thompson points out that author Jeremias who helped to make the use of Abba popular as meaning ‘Daddy,’ retracted his earlier view that Abba was the language of a small child, almost like baby-talk. He later acknowledged that Abba is used as the address of an adult to one’s father. Jeremias wrote “It would have seemed disrespectful, indeed unthinkable, to the sensibilities of Jesus’ contemporaries to address God with this familiar word. Jesus dared to use Abba, that ‘even grown-up sons and daughters addressed their father as abba.’”[2] As is often the case, we remember the erroneous version rather better than the correction, and pastors are still teaching that Abba equates to Daddy.

In the article, “Abba isn’t Daddy”[3], the author acknowledges that Jeremias did not argue that Jesus called God ‘Daddy.’

The term Abba apparently underwent a considerable extension of meaning, replacing an older form of address. “The effect of this widening of meaning was that the word ‘abba’ as a form of address to one’s father was no longer restricted to children, but also used by adult sons and daughters. The childish character of the word (‘daddy’) thus receded, and ‘abba’ acquired the warm, familiar ring which we may feel in such an expression as ‘dear father.’”[4]

An interesting observation comes from Gal. 4. Paul argues that those under the Spirit have become heirs, and therefore adults – they would have outgrown the speech of young children. Paul’s argument here is to emphasize maturity; to use the words appropriate to a young child would have been self-defeating. All of which is to say that since Jesus used Abba as our example – we can be sure that it is the appropriate address.

“Evidently ‘Abba’ was the word which the later church regarded as especially important and sacred, being characteristic of Jesus’ relationship to God…when applied to God it expressed a great and even familiar intimacy and personal closeness which every Jew must have regarded as shocking. On the other hand we must not read into the word a commonplace familiarity with God or even the degrading of God’s divine stature. In Jesus’ usage Abba has for its context the proclamation of the coming reign of God. The Father-God is at the same time the Lord God whose name must be hallowed, whose Kingdom is coming.”[5]

Footnotes:
[1] Joachim Jeremias, Prayers of Jesus, pp. 62,63; New Testament Theology, pp. 67, 68.
[2] Ibid., 
[3] James Barr, “Abba Isn’t ‘Daddy’” 
[4] New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Vol. 1, p. 614.
[5] William Kasper, The God of Jesus.

2 comments:

  1. Pleased to hear it. I always thought the "daddy" explanation was demeaning to God.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, also "demeaning" to Jesus who was anything but a "baby"!

    ReplyDelete