By Barbara Buzzard
“The  complete novelty and uniqueness of Abba as an address to God in
 the prayers of  Jesus shows that it expresses the heart of Jesus’ 
relationship to God. He spoke  to God as a child to its father: 
confidently and securely, and yet at the same  time reverently and 
obediently.”[1] Marianne Meye Thompson points out that author Jeremias  who helped to 
make the use of Abba popular as meaning ‘Daddy,’ retracted his  earlier 
view that Abba was the language of a small child, almost like  
baby-talk. He later acknowledged that Abba is used as the address of an 
adult  to one’s father. Jeremias wrote “It would have seemed 
disrespectful, indeed  unthinkable, to the sensibilities of Jesus’ 
contemporaries to address God with  this familiar word. Jesus dared to 
use Abba, that ‘even grown-up sons and  daughters addressed their father
 as abba.’”[2] As  is often the case, we remember the erroneous version rather better 
than the  correction, and pastors are still teaching that Abba equates 
to Daddy.
In  the article, “Abba isn’t Daddy”[3],  the author acknowledges that Jeremias did not argue that Jesus called God  ‘Daddy.’
The  term Abba apparently underwent a considerable extension of 
meaning, replacing  an older form of address. “The effect of this 
widening of meaning was that the  word ‘abba’ as a form of address to 
one’s father was no longer restricted to  children, but also used by 
adult sons and daughters. The childish character of  the word (‘daddy’) 
thus receded, and ‘abba’ acquired the warm, familiar ring  which we may 
feel in such an expression as ‘dear father.’”[4]
An  interesting observation comes from Gal. 4. Paul argues that those
 under the  Spirit have become heirs, and therefore adults – they would 
have outgrown the  speech of young children. Paul’s argument here is to 
emphasize maturity; to use  the words appropriate to a young child would
 have been self-defeating. All of  which is to say that since Jesus used
 Abba as our example – we can be sure that  it is the appropriate 
address.
“Evidently  ‘Abba’ was the word which the later church regarded as 
especially important and  sacred, being characteristic of Jesus’ 
relationship to God…when applied to God  it expressed a great and even 
familiar intimacy and personal closeness which  every Jew must have 
regarded as shocking. On the other hand we must not read  into the word a
 commonplace familiarity with God or even the degrading of God’s  divine
 stature. In Jesus’ usage Abba has for its context the proclamation of  
the coming reign of God. The Father-God is at the same time the Lord God
 whose  name must be hallowed, whose Kingdom is coming.”[5]
Footnotes:
[1] Joachim  Jeremias, Prayers of Jesus, pp.  62,63; New Testament Theology, pp.  67, 68.
[2] Ibid., 
[3] James  Barr, “Abba Isn’t ‘Daddy’” 
[4] New  International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Vol. 1, p. 614.
[5] William  Kasper, The God of Jesus. 
 
Pleased to hear it. I always thought the "daddy" explanation was demeaning to God.
ReplyDeleteYes, also "demeaning" to Jesus who was anything but a "baby"!
ReplyDelete