Traditional Trini Texts, as I call them, are not persuasive for many reasons:
- “History written by the victors”;
- Most historians, Trini or not, admit that many Christians from earliest times read Christ back into OT narratives on every possible occasion.
- See the so-called church fathers from the 2nd century onward like Irenaeus, Tertullian, etc. https://thehumanjesus.org/2018/01/31/begotten-in-or-outside-the-womb/
- As a result, corruption of scripture, I.e., in manuscript copy tradition.
https://thehumanjesus.org/2022/02/25/church-fathers-corruption-of-scripture/
- Trini scholar Dr. Murray Harris, Jesus as God
“It’s a curious fact that each of the [disputed god texts] contains an interpretative problem of some description. Actually, most contain 2 or 3.”
- Punctuation problems: John 1:1c; Rom 9:5;
- Textual, grammatical: John 1:18; 20:28; 2 Peter 1:1; 2Thess 1:12; Titus 2:13; 1Jn 5:20;
- Contextual: Heb. 1:8-9.
- Many admit the Trinity = Tritheism https://thehumanjesus.org/2024/04/02/scholars-admit-the-trinity-is-tritheism/
- Jesus as God article https://thehumanjesus.org/2019/02/22/jesus-is-god-proof-texts/
- Trini fallacies: http://youtu.be/CYB2x5DJux0
- Ask for any texts if not go to:
https://thehumanjesus.org/2023/04/11/traditional-trinitarian-texts-2/
No comments:
Post a Comment